Sign up. Be inspired. Get clicking.
19 August 2026
Sustainability questions are appearing in event RFPs more often, but most event management companies still don't have a confident answer. This piece looks at why: emissions that were never calculated, or a number that existed but led nowhere. It also sets out what a connected answer looks like: calculation, action, and credible offsetting, backed by real due diligence.
It's happening more. The Events Industry Council's Futures Landscape Study 2025 points to RFPs shifting away from simply asking whether a supplier can host an event, toward asking what that event delivers for people, planet and community, and how that gets proven. Corporates face growing regulatory pressure worldwide to report their emissions in detail, some rules already in force, others phasing in over the next couple of years, and that pressure is starting to show up in how they buy event services.
Most EMCs still don't have a confident answer. Research from Prevue Meetings & Incentives suggests sustainability criteria are still only lightly built into most RFPs today, with cost remaining the dominant factor by a wide margin. That gap, between what's starting to be expected and what most of the industry can currently deliver, is exactly why getting ahead of it now is worth more than waiting to be asked.


For most EMCs, the reason there's no confident answer comes down to one of two things:
Either way, this matters more than it might seem. Under the GHG Protocol, an event's venue hire, catering and freight typically sit under Scope 3, Category 1: purchased goods and services, usually the largest single category in a company's Scope 3 footprint. A properly calculated event footprint is doing real work on a meaningful part of a client's overall emissions picture, not just producing a number for its own sake.
EMCs make the decisions that shape an event's footprint: which venue, how much freight, how many guests, what catering. But the actual measurable data behind those decisions, like venue electricity use or freight weight and distance, often sits with the venue or vendors rather than the EMC, and chasing all of it down isn't always realistic. That's the actual gap. Not unwillingness, but the lack of a straightforward way to turn whatever information is available into a credible number, without needing every input tracked down first.
A better answer is one continuous step: calculate, then act, reduce what can genuinely be reduced, offset what can't. The offset itself should be backed by rigorous due diligence on the underlying projects, not just the emissions maths. CarbonClick applies this kind of scrutiny through its 7-Point Impact Check. The shift is simple, from a number that most of the time goes nowhere, to a footprint that's accounted for and a decision that shapes the next event.
CarbonClick works with event management companies to close this gap:
If any of this sounds familiar, get in touch. We'd like to help.

186 Twilight Road
Clevedon, 2582
Auckland, New Zealand
info@carbonclick.com
Sign up. Be inspired. Get clicking.
Subscribe now to stay up to date with CarbonClick, carbon offsetting and climate action.
By signing up you agree to our Privacy Policy.